Kenneth
Burke--Literature as Equipment for Living
Stories can be seen as a kind of "naming."
Proverbs seek to chart 'type' situations."
This charting of "type" situations is done
"because of its bearing on human welfare." This naming
acts as a kind of behavioral guide.
Complex and sophisticated works of art could be considered
proverbs writ large.
Madame Bovary "is the strategic naming of a
situation. It singles out a pattern of experience that is
sufficiently representative of our social structure for people
to 'need a word for it.'"
Sociological criticism seeks to codify the various
"naming" strategies which have appeared in art.
Its aim would be to discern the general behind the particular,
while formulating a strategy of strategies.
*
For
Burke, stories can be seen as a kind of "naming."
People often find themselves in situations that recur so
frequently that they feel the need to "have a word for
it." Burke focuses at first on the role of proverbs:
"Social structures give rise to 'type' situaltions . . . many
proverbs seek to chart, in more or less homey and picturesque
ways, these 'type' situations." Burke says that this
naming, this charting of "type" situations is done
"because of its bearing on human welfare." This naming
acts as a kind of behavioral guide, giving the hearers of
such proverbs guidance on what to expect in certain situations.
Burke then
extends the "naming" activity of proverbs into a way
of looking at literature. "Could the most complex and
sophisticated works of art legitimately be considered somewhat
as 'proverbs writ large?'" Burke then goes on to
suggest that these complex works of art can be looked at as
if they were "designed to organize and command the army of
one's thoughts and images, and to so organize them that one
'imposes upon the enemy the time and place and conditions for
fighting prefered by oneself.'"
A novel like Madame
Bovary "is the strategic naming of a situation. It
singles out a pattern of experience that is sufficiently
representative of our social structure . . . for people to 'need
a word for it.'"
The kind of
"naming-of-type-situations" criticism here outlined
Burke calls "sociological criticism." It
seeks to codify the various "naming" strategies which
have appeared in art, many of which would be
"'timeless,' for many of the 'typical, recurrent
situations' are not peculiar to our own civilization at
all." Its aim would be "to discern the 'general
behind the particular,'" and would treat its categories
as active rather than inert methods of analysis.
These categories would be more concerened with an analysis of
what works of art do than with what they are. They
would consider art as "strategies for selecting enemies
and allies, for socializing losses, for warding off evil eye,
for purification, propitiation, and desanctification,
consolation and veangeance, admonition and exhortation, implicit
commands or instructions of one sort or another." Art
forms would be looked at with an eye to their "typical
ingredients" and their relation to "typical
situations." The intention would be one of "formulating
a 'strategy of strategies." |