Levi-Strauss--The
Structural Study of Myth
What constitutes a myth is not the individual versions, but all
the versions together. In studying myth, what one does is study
as many versions of the myth as can be found, then abstract from
those versions a general pattern or sequence.
"Myth, like the rest of language, is made up of constituent
units." These constituent units, or mythemes, is a
relation, and the meaning of a myth is to be found in
"bundles of such relations."
Levi-Strauss uses two terms to characterize mythological time--synchronic
and diachronic--which he relates to the Saussurian
distinction of langue and parole. The synchronic
is "reversible" while the diachronic is
"non-reversible."
Mythical thought always progresses from the awareness of
oppositions toward their resolution.
*
Levi-Strauss
is the Structuralist anthropologist in the study of myth.
In his structuaralist analysis, what constitutes a myth is not
the individual versions, but all the versions together. In
studying myth, what one does is study as many versions of the
myth as can be found, then abstract from those versions a
general pattern or sequence. Levi-Strauss derives at least
some of his principles from the linguistics of Saussure:
"it is the combination of sounds, not the sounds
themselves, which provides the significant data." It is the
combination of the versions of a myth, and not the individual
versions themselves, which provides significant data.
Levi-Strauss
insists that "myth cannot simply be treated as language if
its specific problems are to be solved; myth is language:
to be known, myth has to be told; it is a part of human
speech." From this, he derives the principle that "Myth,
like the rest of language, is made up of constituent
units." These constituent units, or mythemes,
are relations, and the meaning of a myth is to be found in
"bundles of such relations."
Levi-Strauss
uses two terms to characterize mythological time--synchronic
and diachronic--which he relates to the Saussurian
distinction of langue and parole. The synchronic
is "reversible" while the diachronic is
"non-reversible." To study language synchronically
would be to study it as an entire system at a given point in
time; to study language diachronically would be to study it and
its development over a period of time.
Levi-Strauss'
method is roughly as follows: He classifies mythemes and then
assigns them numbers. He then arranges those mythemes on a chart
arranging vertical columns of the same number from left to right
on the page.
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
A |
Cadmos seeks his sister Europa,
ravished by Zeus |
|
|
|
B |
|
|
Cadmos kills the dragon |
|
C |
|
The Spartoi kill one another |
|
|
D |
|
|
|
Labdacos (Laois' father) =lame? |
D |
|
Oedipus kills his father, Laios |
|
Laois (Oedipus'
father)=left-sided? |
E |
|
|
Oedipus kills the Sphynx |
|
F |
|
|
|
Oedipus=swollen-foot? |
G |
Oedipus marries his mother,
Jocasta |
|
|
|
H |
|
Eteocles kills his brother
Polynices |
|
|
I |
Antigone buries her brother,
Polynices, despite prohibition |
|
|
|
"Were we to tell the
myth, we would disregard the columns and read the rows from left
to right and from top to bottom. But if we want to understand
the myth, then we will have to disregard one half of the
diachronic dimension (top to bottom) and read from left to
right, column after column, each one being considered as a
unit." Levi-Strauss interprets the first vertical column as
having something to do with "blood relations which are
overemphasized, that is, are more intimate than they should
be." The second column he interprets in the opposite
way--it has as its "common feature the overrating of blood
relations." The third column "refers to monsters being
slain," while the fourth refers to difficulties in walking
straight and standing upright." The realtionship between
columns three and four is as follows: the killing of monsters in
column three is a "denial of the authochthonous origin of
man," while the difficulty in walking straight, which
Levi-Strauss identifies as a characteristic of "men born
from the Earth," in the fourth column reflects the
"persistence of the authocthonous origin of man."
Levi-Strauss'
most famous principle is probably the principle of
opposition: "mythical thought always progresses from the
awareness of oppositions toward their resolution." This
opposition tends to move from "two opposite terms with no
intermediary," to "two equivalent terms which admit of
a third one as a mediator." He speaks of this arising and
resolution of opposites in myth as a dialectic, "a series
of mediating devices, each of which generates the next one by a
process of opposition and correlation." |
|
| | |